1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 23, 200, the Plaintiff entered the Korea Air Force bachelor’s Office and was discharged from active service on February 1, 2001, but on January 31, 2004, and filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State with the Defendant on June 25, 2012, on the basis of the difference between the Diplomatic Office and the former.

B. On February 26, 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination on the amount of distinguished service to the State on the ground that there is no proximate causal relationship between the applicant and the military duty after deliberation by the Board of Patriots

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, and 6; Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was exposed for a long time from April 23, 2001 to October 10, 2002 to 10, while serving in the First M&A B, the plaintiff was under a shooting training without receiving the ear dog on October 23, 2001. In particular, on January 11, 2002, the plaintiff was diagnosed at the Jeonnam University Hospital on January 11, 2002 by both Cheongnam National University Hospital with the Cheongnam National University Hospital with the examination of the Cheongneopasis and each spathal chronological disorder. The difference in this case was caused or rapidly aggravated due to the performance of military duties.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. (1) The plaintiff was judged as normal on all items in the physical examination before entering the military, and the latter and the prosecutor confirmed whether or not there was a tent of the antiscopic and the interview with the military officers.

(2) From April 23, 2001 to January 14, 2002, the Plaintiff served as the head of the Ban from the First M&A B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B, and from January 14, 2002 to October 10, 202, respectively.

(3) The Plaintiff was subject to the shooting training in October 2001, and thereafter appealed from the military officer in charge of aviation stage units, was diagnosed on January 10, 2002 by each side of the Machina, and was diagnosed by the Machina Office on January 11, 2002 by the Jeonnam University Hospital on January 11, 2002.

(4) at the time.