1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a public official in the correctional service on October 27, 1989, and was promoted to the teachers on August 23, 1997, and was promoted to the teachers on August 23, 2005, and began to serve in the Daejeon Regional Correctional Headquarters B prison security division from February 1, 2010.

(A) No. 4-1). (b)

On July 11, 2018, the General Disciplinary Committee of the Ministry of Justice decided to the Plaintiff for two months of suspension from office on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 and 63 of the State Public Officials Act. On August 1, 2018, the Defendant issued two months of suspension from office against the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant disposition of suspension from office” (Evidence A1 and 2). The grounds for the instant disposition of suspension from office are as follows:

[No. 2 of the No. 2 of the No. 1 of the No. 2 of the Disciplinary Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the “Disciplinary Resolution”) is deemed to be a ground for disposition in full because the “grounds for the request for the Disciplinary Resolution” are written. However, in light of the fact acknowledged by the Disciplinary Resolution in Article 3(3) of the Disciplinary Resolution, the grounds for disciplinary action are limited to the facts recognized by paragraph (3) in light of the fact that the facts recognized by the Disciplinary Committee are individually stated, and whether the grounds for disciplinary action are grounds for disciplinary action. 1. The Plaintiff caused fear to the members of the Department as follows.

On March 6, 2017, at around 17:00, the keyboard on its own books was destroyed by drinking.

(C) The date of the fire-fighting disaster, the fire-fighting fire, and the fire-fighting disaster.

② From March 7, 2017, the Plaintiff spits spits spits on paper cups, and then put them on its own computer body so that other departments can see it, so that the members of the department feel displeasure.

③ On November 10, 2017, the Plaintiff promulgated a garbbbbbus to the multi-use room, leaving the office, and then going back to the office, and then selling back to the office as drinking, and going out of the office, “A flob fch flob flob” to the members of the department.