A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of a commercial sex trafficking business in the name of “C” on the first basement in Gwangju City B.

Defendant installed five facilities, etc. in a marina room installed in the above business establishment, from December 1, 2016 to June 26, 2017, Defendant 10,000 won from an unspecified male guest who found the above business establishment from around December 1, 2016, and caused female employees, such as D, to engage in the act of similarity by stimulating the sexual organ of the above customer by hand and hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against E or F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging sexual traffic, [the surcharge shall be calculated as KRW 6,750,000 according to the investigation report (the evidence record 2: 74 pages, the net time 33)];

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc., which does not have a significant social hazard by commercializing sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals; and (b) the Defendant had the same criminal record; and (c) the Defendant, without being aware of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic was discovered on December 2, 2016, continues to commit the crime in the same manner at

However, considering the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine, the confession of the crime of this case and the attitude of reflecting it, the circumstances of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the scope of recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines, the scale of business and profits, etc., the punishment shall be determined as per the order.