(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.03.20 2018가단51094

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2020.03.20 2018가단51094

용역대금 반환 청구의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 31, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for special adjustment grants to Gyeonggi-do for the purpose of holding the instant EXPO with the proposal of the incorporated association C (hereinafter referred to as “C”), which planned the event of B EXPO (hereinafter referred to as “instant EXPO”), and received 400 million won of the instant EXPO-related special adjustment grants from the Gyeonggi-do Governor.

B. Around March 2015, the Secretary D of C planned the instant EXPO event in order to secure the operating funds of C while securing the special adjustment grants from Gyeonggi-do. The special adjustment grants cannot be distributed directly to C with respect to the event event project used as the financial resources of a subsidy program supported by the private sector or not directly hosted by the Si/Gun. Thus, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to “the Plaintiff, by allowing the Plaintiff to apply for the special adjustment grants to Gyeonggi-do, to receive the special adjustment grants 400 million won from Gyeonggi-do, so that C may proceed with the event of this case by accepting the above request of C, and the Plaintiff was able to proceed with the event of this case by accepting the above request of C.

C The Secretary-General D and the Director-General E of the Corporate Support Headquarters prepared a plan to secure C’s operating funds through the aforesaid special adjustment grants in consultation with G representative director G of the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), and the F prepared a estimate to the effect that the F will pay the service cost to the transaction company after being in charge of the event agency service of this case and pay the service cost to the transaction company in excess of the actual amount, and used the difference as C’s operating funds

C. However, the Plaintiff did not agree to F as an agent for the instant EXPO as planned by C and F, and C suggested the Defendant as an agent for the instant EXPO on behalf of F, and the Defendant had the intent to act as agent for the instant EXPO.

The defendant is "the defendant from the H father of C" and the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원평택지원 2020.03.20 2018가단51094

-서울고등법원 2019.05.09 2018노3294

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.22 2013고합678

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.19 2017고단8063

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.25 2018나27484