logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.11.20 2018고단1026
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 23, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the leisure support of the Friwon method, and on February 18, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the leisure support of Friwon method.

On October 29, 2018, around 20:45, the Defendant driven Bco or car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.073% from the 2km section to the Samsung Apartment’s front road located in the 394-11 at the time of innju, in front of the subordinate apartment located in Sejong-ro 394-11.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The criminal place;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. The provision of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of imprisonment for a crime under the relevant provision of the Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution provides that a person shall not drive drinking again while being aware of and against the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; the number of times of punishment for the same kind of crime; the number of times of drinking alcohol and driving distance; there is no penalty exceeding the fine; and the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, support relationship, etc. shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the factors of sentencing under Article 51 of

arrow