logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.01.29 2015고정700
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who is a defendant A shall provide or lease a private-use truck for transport purposes;

However, from Jun. 2014 to Jul. 29, 2015, the Defendant provided that, from Jun. 2, 2014 to Jun. 29, 2015, the Defendant provided that, from Jun. 2, 2014 to Jun. 29, 2015, the F private-use truck owned by the Company B for use in the delivery of alternative cargo.

2. As to his business, Defendant B, who was an employee, caused Defendant A to commit the same offense as the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the defendant A;

1. Each automatic registration ledger, a copy of business registration certificate, and a certificate for all registered matters (B);

1. Number plates and on-site photographs of door-to-door vehicles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (one witness E and one other);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 67 Subparag. 7 and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act (Selection of Penalty)

B. Defendant B: Articles 69(1), 67 subparag. 7, and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow