logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2018.09.20 2018고단72
절도등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 70,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. On December 30, 2017, around 04:10 on December 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a simple credit cooperative in other accounts; and (b) cut off cash 432,000 won by inserting the gap in the “F convenience store” located in Gun E before the Defendant worked for the Defendant.

B. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (Commercial Sex Acts) (1) The Defendant paid 20,000 won to Ha who is a multiple employee and engaged in commercial sex acts on the same day at Hodo 506 Hodo Gun G in 05:21 on the same day, and paid 20,000 won to I.

2) The Defendant paid 200,000 won to B who is a multiple employee at the same place on the same day and engaged in sexual intercourse once.

2. Defendant B, at around 11:31 on the same day, committed sexual intercourse by receiving KRW 200,00 from A, as described in paragraph 1-b, and engaging in sexual intercourse once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. The witness A’s legal statement (defendant B)

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. The photograph of each CCTV upon closure [Defendant B only delivered a coffee to the Mosel upon the order of Defendant A and did not have a sexual traffic. However, in full view of the following facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court and the circumstances revealed therefrom, the fact that the Defendant engaged in sexual traffic as stated in the judgment can be fully acknowledged.

① Defendant A paid KRW 200,000 to Defendant B, and engaged in sexual intercourse with Defendant B.

The investigative agency consistently made statements from the investigative agency to the court of the instant case.

② Defendant B, on the date and time stated in the facts charged, entered the telecom with Defendant A and stayed approximately 17 minutes.

This time is somewhat long to deliver coffees.

arrow