The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In the judgment of the court below, the term "sexual assault therapy" in the text of the judgment below is "sexual assault."

1. The gist of the reasons for appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment, 80 hours of order to complete the course) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant was found to have committed each of the crimes of this case when the defendant was in a trial; (b) the defendant had no record of criminal punishment prior to each of the crimes of this case; (c) the defendant took pictures or recorded voice in a sexual intercourse with several women including the victims; and (d) the victim showed his image or gives voice to the victims by notifying the victims of his sexual intercourse with his sexual intercourse with a very close relationship with the victims; and (c) the victim shows his or her sexual humiliation to the victims; and (d) the victim committed the crime against the victim C by the male-friendly body of the victim; and (e) the victim committed the crime against the victim, which was committed by the male-friendly body of the victim; (e) the victim was extremely interviewed with the victim; (e) the victim did not agree with the various methods, such as purchasing fingers with the video recording function; (e) the victim and the victim did not have any circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered after the judgment of the court below; and (e) the defendant's circumstances, motive and circumstances, and circumstances, etc.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. Since it is apparent that the “sexual assault treatment lecture” in the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in the “sexual assault treatment program”, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.