logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.10.14 2020고정127
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 21, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months at the Gwangju District Court on the grounds of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the said judgment was finalized on August 29, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

Around 10:50 on December 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the 2000 Scam correctional institution, the Defendant: (b) around 10:50 on 10, 2019, the Victim C (the 55-yearsssssss) was trial costs on the ground that the Victim C (the 55-yearssssssss) would attempt to look at the goods he purchased without his own permission; (c) the victim’s face face was cut one time due to drinking, and (d) the Defendant was able to move to the worker room. In the process of the Victim’s head, the victim’s head was broom and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination of suspect suspect C to prepare a private police officer, and each statement of witness D to and E to prepare a private police officer;

1. He/she shall prepare a statement on the preparation of the F and a working report;

1. Criminal records stated in investigation reports and investigation reports: Application of criminal record records, etc. data inquiry meetings and the Gwangju District Court Decision 2020 Height3280 shall apply;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order recognizes and reflects the crime of this case. However, the fact that the defendant, while being confined to a prison due to an attempted larceny, assaulted another prisoner and injured him/her, and that he/she has been punished for violent crimes constitutes an unfavorable sentencing element.

In addition, this case shall consider equity with the case of concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the form of assault by the defendant, and the victim.

arrow