logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2019.08.21 2018고단1459
상해
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Defendant A and the victim C (n, 62 years of age, death on July 8, 2018) are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on September 8, 1978, and Defendant B are children of Defendant A and the victim.

Defendant

B At around 10:40 on May 8, 2014, the Defendant expressed that the victim called “A” at the Defendant’s house located in Doo-si D, the victim expressed to “A” the victim’s hand that “I will come back with the victim’s her hand to the ward.” On the other hand, the Defendant saw the victim’s hand, who is the victim’s own her own neck, led the victim to the victim’s living room.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the lineal ascendant's lineal ascendant's victim, such as the Rail on the side side of the fourth balance of the left-hand side in need of medical treatment for about four weeks.

B. At around 20:00 on September 9, 2016, Defendant A returned home to the E Hospital as stated in paragraph (1), and the victim saw that “I am home to this Doar, Doar, Doar, Doar, was trying to be changed to the victim’s quality” on the floor of hand, Defendant A saw the victim’s knife at one time, cut off the victim’s hand, and kids the victim’s head head, kid from the victim’s hand, led the victim’s head, leading the victim’s head, leading the victim’s head to the ward one time.

As a result, the Defendant got a string of a shoulder that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to readily conclude that the facts charged are proven beyond a reasonable doubt solely based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

① Direct evidence supporting the Defendants’ injury inflicted upon the victim as stated in the facts charged lies in the victim’s statement and in F, G, and H’s statement specializing in such statement.

However, the victim's statement is for the following reasons.

arrow