logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.26 2014나2018306
부당이득금반환 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the entry in this case are as follows: (a) the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following in the 6th page 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance

The plaintiff asserts that the construction cost of this case was already extinguished upon the plaintiff's reimbursement, since the construction cost of this case is the original KRW 1.544 billion according to the construction contract document (Evidence 1-1) made between the plaintiff, the defendant and the court of appeal, and that the construction cost of this case is only the false contract document for the construction cost of KRW 1.980 million (Evidence 1-2). Thus, the construction cost of this case is already extinguished upon considering the following evidence, evidence No. 14, evidence No. 19-1 through 6, evidence No. 20-1 through No. 20, evidence No. 20, evidence No. 14, evidence No. 25, evidence No. 27-2, evidence No. 29-2, and evidence No. 30 of the construction contract as well as evidence No. 1-1, evidence No. 30 and testimony No. 1-2, each of the following facts are stated at the court of first instance on the construction site of this case.

arrow