1. Nonpermission regarding the Defendant’s application for permission to change the use of a large-scale repair on November 16, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 14, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to engage in construction, substantial repair, and alteration of the purpose of the use of complex construction, including permission to engage in development activities and permission to divert farmland, to newly construct a funeral hall of the size of 1,141.87 square meters, total floor area of 3,011.6 square meters, and a funeral hall of the size of 4 floors on the ground (hereinafter “the funeral hall of this case”) on the ground of 1,141.87 square meters, total floor area, 3,01.6 square meters, and a funeral hall of the size of

B. On November 16, 2017, the Defendant issued a notice of non-permission regarding the instant application for change on November 16, 2017 (Evidence A7) and November 23, 2017 (Evidence B 1). Since all of the above notice are identical, the Defendant’s notice of non-permission as of November 16, 2017, as stated in the written claim of the instant complaint, is deemed the instant disposition.

The Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the non-permission of the modification of the construction permission (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the following grounds:

Newly constructed a funeral hall in the Ysan-gu Cdong, Seoul

1. Grounds for non-permission of construction permission;

(a) Grounds for non-permission for development activities, which are subject to constructive processing of building permission under Article 11 (5) of the Building Act, (1) the grounds for non-approval for development activities (the result of deliberation by the 9th Urban Planning Deliberation Committee of 2017) - The main arterial roads linking innovation cities and urban districts as the front-time official door of the front-time city, which are the main arterial roads linking innovation cities and urban districts, and may be obstacles in the development of neighboring Dparks, and the long-term development direction at the front-time city, are inappropriate for the location of funeral hall (the fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, Gap 1, 7

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is located in the outer road from E to F, and thus it cannot be said that the main text of the Jeonju City is the front city. However, it is true that the instant application site is located around the road that connects innovation cities with correspondences, but it is considerably away from innovation cities and correspondences.