1. On June 10, 2013, at the third interim council of delegates, the Defendant removed the Plaintiffs from the Defendant’s association members.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 29, 1969, the Defendant is a cooperative established with the aim of improving the economic, social, and cultural status of its members by enhancing the productivity of agriculture of its members, promoting the expansion of markets for agricultural products produced by its members and facilitating their distribution, and providing technology, funds, materials, and information necessary for its members. The Plaintiffs are the Defendant’s members, and the Plaintiff A is the Defendant’s non-permanent auditors.

B. At around February 26, 2013, the Plaintiffs and D, E, and F (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) found in G house located by the head of the Defendant’s association at the time of the Defendant’s association at around 22:20, and divided two-hours related to G and association operation and resignation.

C. On March 25, 2013, Plaintiff A and D agreed that G would not refuse to carry out a personal seal after the end of the third board of directors’ meeting.

G immediately resigned from the partnership head. D.

On the other hand, on April 12, 2013, Plaintiff A invested in dividends, which was not found until March 31, 2011, as of April 8, 2011, in the conversion of the dividends to the use and dividends as of April 8, 2011, was erroneous due to the employee’s failure to work, and the Defendant’s vicarious performance of duties by the president of the partnership and the auditor, made a document stating the date of marking the dividends as of April 1, 201, and corrected the date of marking as of April 1, 201.

E. At the temporary representative meeting held on June 10, 2013 at the request of the defendant J and K, the representative of the defendant, the defendant passed a resolution to dismiss the plaintiff et al. from the association members on the following grounds with the consent of 48 persons, except for the plaintiff et al. who is a person subject to expulsion. The resolution to dismiss the plaintiff A from the non-permanent auditor for the following reasons was adopted as 41 persons and 6 persons who agree with the resolution to dismiss the plaintiff A from the non-permanent auditor.

1. The plaintiff et al. found the office of G from 10:20 to 12:20 on February 26, 2013 to 13:20 on February 26, 2013 to have the ability of the plaintiff et al. to be discharged from the clothes of the head of the association and to serve as the head of the association;

It also refers to the personnel problem, which is the inherent authority of the president of the association, and discusses new leaders.