Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and the appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to D vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicles”), which includes vehicle injury security, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).
B. On April 2, 2019, at around 21:40, the Defendant’s vehicle: (a) obstructed the first lane of the front road of the Daegu Suwon-gu F apartment, Daegu-gu, with the center line; and (b) shocked the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was maju, into the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
A driver who had driven the Plaintiff vehicle
C On April 3, 2019, G Council members diagnosed that the Plaintiff’s children aboard the Plaintiff’s vehicle undergo approximately two weeks’s stable medical treatment by using “satisf, tensions, fat, and tensions of satisf,” and that the children who were on board the Plaintiff’s vehicle undergo approximately two weeks’ stable medical treatment at one Council on the same day, respectively. C was diagnosed that “the Plaintiff’s children, who were on board the Plaintiff’s vehicle, need approximately two weeks’ stable medical treatment by using “satisf, satf, satf, satf, and tension,” and C was diagnosed from April 3, 2019 to May 2, 2019, from April 3, 2019 to April 15, 2019.
(d)
The Plaintiff paid to C the insurance proceeds of KRW 4,528,500 (=the amount of KRW 2,528,500 agreed on medical treatment costs of KRW 2,528,500) in total with the medical treatment costs and the amount agreed upon by C and their children.
[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 9 (including various numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff suffered injury from the plaintiff's passengers due to the accident of this case caused by one's negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle, and that the plaintiff paid insurance money to the plaintiff's passengers, so the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount of 4,528,500 won for indemnity and the delayed damages.
The argument is asserted.
The defendant is very insignificant in the shock of the accident of this case, and thus, the injury of the plaintiff vehicle passengers and the accident of this case.