The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of a fine of three million won imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake, there is a family member to provide support, such as his wife and child, and the economic situation is not sufficient.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have escaped without taking any measures to cause damage to a considerable of KRW 870,000 for repair cost by shocking the central separation zone. It seems that the crime of this case may interfere with the police investigation on the driver's specific and drinking operation by causing the change of the defendant's words and behavior after traffic accident and the reversal of the defendant's statement. The court below appears to have set the punishment against the defendant in consideration of various circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances at the trial, and there is no other change of circumstances at the trial, and there is no other reason that the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.