logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.02.09 2016고단1946
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud, etc. in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch branch branch, which became final and conclusive on November 11, 2016.

On July 27, 2016, the Defendant of the 2016 Highest 1946 criminal facts, posted on the bulletin board the “J27 Highest State,” which is the Internet trading site of the victim D, purchases “G27 wheel chairs.”

The phrase “to deliver the goods to the victim,” and contact the victim with the intent of “to deliver the goods first at the time of the transfer of the proceeds.”

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not possess the above goods, so even if he receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver it.

The defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 130,00,00 from the victim to the Busan Bank Account under the name of the defendant as the price for the goods on the same day, and from around that time to September 2, 2016, the defendant deceivings the victims by the same method 13 times in total, such as the statement in the list of crimes attached hereto, and received KRW 2,205,50,000 from the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

The criminal defendant of the 2016 Highest 2286, on September 10, 2016, sells a content game machine on the bulletin board of the "China", which is an Internet trading site.

“The victim E who reported and contacted the article posted” will first deliver the article to the victim E at the request of the remittance of the price.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not possess the above goods, so even if he received the price from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he received 150,000 won from the victim to the account designated by the defendant as the price for the goods on the same day.

arrow