1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “The steel pipe, panel roof, single-story house, and 195 square meters” in the second 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance; “The auction procedure” in the second 8th 8th 12th 2nd 2nd 12nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 192m2, etc. of animal-related facilities (hereinafter “instant building”; “the result of appraiser F’s appraisal” in the third 1st 3rd 3rd 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 20, “23. through 24.” and “the result of appraisal commission and inquiry” in the third 20th 3rd 20th 3rd 20th 202nd 4nd 2015th 2015.”

(4) The court of first instance held that “Defendant C” is a co-defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part against Co-Defendant C, which is separated and confirmed. The court of first instance held that the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of first instance presented by the Defendant to this court, and the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 5-1 and 5-2 are not included in the evidence No. 5-2.

A. A. A summary of the Defendant’s assertion 1) The Defendant: (a) on around 192, the G where the owner of the instant site was the owner; and (b) on the instant site, the rent is free of charge; and (c) on the basis of the term of use of the building newly constructed on the instant site by setting the term of lease as the term of use of the building (hereinafter

After concluding the instant building, the instant building was newly constructed on the instant land, and the steel pipe structure, among the instant buildings, was cross-story.