logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.04.22 2013고단337
산지관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 37"

1. Any person who intends to fell standing timber in a forest shall obtain permission from the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu or the head of the competent regional forest office;

Nevertheless, on March 19, 2013, the Defendant, without obtaining permission for a permanent settlement market, cut out standing timber in C, D, and E forests, in return for work, and damaged forests of an amount equivalent to 3,528 square meters of standing timber damage by cutting out standing timber in the amount of KRW 257,00, afforestation cost, KRW 1,787,00 of standing timber damage by using machinery saw, along with the parts of the work in the name of the Defendant, together with the parts of the work in the name of the Defendant (17.9 cubic meters), using the machinery saw, etc. (17.78 cubic meters in size), and KRW 20 in Acarsi City (3.2 cubic meters in size), without permission for a permanent settlement market.

2. No person shall file a report on conversion of a mountainous district without filing a report on conversion of a mountainous district or file a report on conversion of a mountainous district by false or other unjust means;

Nevertheless, on January 2013, the Defendant filed a false report on a permanent viewing forest park located in 223 Sinsan-ro in the Sinsan-ro, and even though it does not know the contents of the business and is not a direct business owner, on the ground that he/she is qualified as a farmer, on the ground that he/she is qualified as a farmer, with the purpose of newly building agricultural product storage facilities.

In addition, on March 20, 2013, when the report on the construction is in progress with the director of the civil petition service division for resident viewing and the head of the Nakdongdong and the consultation with the head of the relevant Dong, and the validity of the above report on the construction has not yet occurred (on May 9, 2013, the validity of the acceptance of the report is retroactively extinguished as a result of cancellation of consultation between the above report and the relevant agency on the grounds of false report on the ground that the report on the construction has been filed on May 9, 2013).

arrow