logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고정2188
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the head of the general restaurant called “E” located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D and the first floor above the ground.

No one shall sell liquor, etc. under the Liquor Tax Act, which is a drug harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 00:00 on March 30, 2015, the Defendant sold a small amount of KRW 20,000 in the market price to juvenile F (17 tax, female), G (17 tax, female), etc. at the main point of “E” as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness G or F’s legal statement;

1. On-site photographs [in light of the legislative purport of the Juvenile Protection Act, the owner or employee of a business establishment prohibited from allowing access to the relevant juvenile shall be highly liable for not allowing access to the relevant business establishment for the protection of the juvenile. Thus, the owner or employee of a business establishment prohibited from access to the juvenile shall individually verify the age of the person subject to public probative evidence of age to the age group that is likely to be juvenile unless there are any circumstances that make it difficult to identify the person subject to access as the juvenile objectively, based on his/her resident registration certificate or other similar evidence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 93Do2914, Jan. 14, 1994; 2002Do2425, Jun. 28, 2002; 200Do2425, Jun. 20, 200). Thus, if the juvenile did not take any measures to confirm his/her age, barring any special circumstances, the court shall find the person subject to the Act as an employee’s intent and employee 304.

arrow