logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.09.22 2015고정973
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 16:50 on March 16, 2015, the Defendant was carrying the vehicle in the victim D’s preferential parking zone in front of the Yandong-gu, Ansan-gu, Kasan-si; (b) on the phone of the victim, the Defendant was moving

At this time, the victim saw that the defendant's moving of the vehicle and put it in another resident priority parking zone, and that "a vehicle should be taken back after leaving the vehicle," and that "the defendant's moving of the vehicle should return to the vehicle."

Accordingly, the defendant, who was parked, was living with the victim, and the victim was living with the victim.

At this time, the defendant injured the victim of the above victim's face with his/her hand and walking the mouth of his/her mouth, such as on the face that he/she need to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Part concerning D statements in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (record 54 pages of evidence);

1. Application of the case photographic statute

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act only contain the victim's head while avoiding the victim's head from being sealed, and they do not cause any injury or injury to the defendant as stated in the above crime.

In full from the police investigation to this court, the victim D stated that, as a whole, the Defendant and the parking problems were relatively consistent from the police investigation to the police investigation, the Defendant was faced with the face with the hand floor of the Defendant and the scambling. Such victim’s statement is credibility in line with the images of photographs taken by the police station immediately after the instant case.

The statement of the victim.

arrow