Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter cargo vehicles.

On September 14, 2014, the Defendant was driving the above cargo vehicle around 03:19 on September 14, 2014, and was going to proceed to the direction of the Osan Environmental Business Office in the substitute at the front of the National Assembly members in Osan City.

Since there is a sign to regulate the prohibition of direct dust, there was a duty of care that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle should not be directly engaged in driving the motor vehicle according to the direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to neglect the direction of the prohibition of direct flight, and caused the Defendant to go straight from the left side of the invasion to the right and go against the signal.

E was received with the left part of the cargo loaded on the cargo in the Poter.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the Victim F (31) who is a driver of Oral Baba due to the above occupational negligence, such as acquisition, which requires approximately 20 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Photographs;

1. A report on internal investigation (Preparation of a map at the scene of an accident and attachment of photographs), internal investigation report (to photographbboxes, photographic pictures, and CD reproduction);

1. Application of statutes in a statement of intention;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of a selective fine (only when the victim suffers damage, but also when the victim's negligence in violation of signal seems to have contributed significantly to the occurrence of an accident, considering the fact that the defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and that there is no other penalty force, except for two previous years of a fine before 200;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;