logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단4242
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On September 12, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Victim F, a Co., Ltd. E, to supply and sell active public water monopoly, but did not receive 100 million won of the down payment from the damaged party.

When the Defendant came to know on November 2012 that the victim intended to supply the fry to another business entity, the Defendant requested the victim to supply the fry fishing to the victim by providing the fying that “A person who performs the fying work together with B has refying power,” and then, on November 22, 2012, made the victim contact with the victim by telephone, thereby reducing the number of people to purchase the fying fishing by sending the fying.

If the long-term language is supplied, it is false that the price will be paid only one week after the supply.

However, the Defendant did not secure retail markets for the purchase of long-term fish, and did not sell long-term fish, and did not have any particular property, and did not have any intent or ability to pay long-term fish to the victim, including bank debts of KRW 40,000,000, and did not have any intent or ability to pay long-term fish to the victim. On the other hand, the Defendant had shown the long-term monopoly contract entered into with

Ultimately, on November 23, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained the supply of 1.5 tons as a long as the market price of KRW 48 million from the arctium leased by G located in Incheon on November 23, 2012.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements by the victim, e-mail, exclusive supply and sale contracts by investigative agencies and this court, certified copies of the register, goods supply contracts, photographs, and fishery resources transplant approval.

In this regard, e-mail and goods contract are the contents that the defendant received the victim's e-mail and calculated by size, and the exclusive supply and sale contract was concluded with the victim around September 12, 2012, prior to the delivery, and the copy of the register is H. before the victim's delivery.

arrow