logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.18 2016고단5210
향토예비군설치법위반등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 5210] Defendant is a member of the local reserve forces belonging to the fifth unit of the 6753 unit.

1. On September 29, 2016, the Defendant was unable to undergo the said training without justifiable grounds even after receiving a notice of convening a local reserve force under the name of the fifth unit commander of the 6753 unit unit commander of the 6753 unit commander of the 6753 unit commander of the 201st unit, which would result in the second supplementary training (the carried forward of the 201th unit of the 6753 unit commander of the 201 unit commander of the 6753 unit commander of the 201th unit commander of the 2013 unit commander of the 2013 unit commander of the 201th unit unit.

2. The Defendant did not undergo the above training without justifiable grounds even after he/she received a notice of convening a call for the training of the local reserve forces in the name of the fifth unit commander of the 6753 unit unit 6753 unit 5 unit 5 unit 6753, which would result in the second supplementary training conducted at the places specified in paragraph (1) from October 24, 2016 to October 26, 2016 (from May 10, 2016 to May 12, 2016).

3. The Defendant did not undergo the above training without justifiable grounds even after receiving a muster notice for training of the local reserve forces in the name of the 6753 unit commander in the name of the 5 unit commander in the 6753 unit commander, which caused the second second supplementary training conducted at the places specified in paragraph (1) on October 27, 2016, at the same time and at the places specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

[2016 Highest 5675] On March 24, 2016, the Defendant agreed that the construction work process rate should be paid if the construction work rate reaches 50%, while performing the construction work by receiving a subcontract for a green tree tending project consisting of 42 lots from the victim E Co., Ltd. (the representative director F).

On March 31, 2016, the Defendant requested F to pay the amount of money, including the labor cost, for eight persons, from the E office located in the company E office located in 104/203/203, the building cost of H apartment building 104/203, Nam-gun, Nam-gun, Seoul, to “the construction progress rate is less than 50%.” The personnel cost is the demand to transfer the labor cost to each other’s account.” The Defendant demanded payment of money, including the labor cost, for eight persons, such as I.

(b).

arrow