The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended sentence for five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, the fact that the defendant partially repaid the amount acquired by the victim, and the fact that the judgment of the first head of the crime of the judgment below should consider equity with the case that the judgment of the first head of the judgment

However, in light of the contents and circumstances of the crime of this case, the amount of fraud, etc., and the damage still remains, and the victim is punished against the defendant as a result of a considerable amount of damage, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee (six months to one year and six months) / [the scope of recommended punishment] of the basic area (6 months to one year and six months) [the scope of recommended punishment] of the basic area (6 months to one year and six months) [the person who is subject to special sentencing] of the basic area (6 months to one year and six months] of the crime of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.