logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.06.12 2019나63988
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the plaintiff and F did not work for an enterprise other than B during the same period of time. The plaintiff added "no one shall be deemed to have any ".............." The part of " shall be deemed to have known of the damage caused by the accident in this case when the plaintiff suffered an injury due to the accident in this case...." According to the evidence No. 6, No. 15, and No. 16, the plaintiff could not be deemed to have been aware of the occurrence of the accident in this case's case's urine 12, No. 1, and No. 15, and No. 2011, after the accident occurred, the plaintiff could not be deemed to have been aware of the fact that there was an accident in this case's case's urine 1, No. 2000, and No. 1, No. 1, 2011, and No. 28, etc., which had been found to have been an accident in this case's.

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified and the plaintiff's appeal is justified.

arrow