1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is the head of the organization's name "C," and D is the director of a medical corporation E (hereinafter "E"), who is a member of the above organization, and the defendant is the following.

As described in the subsection, a person who was an affiliated lawyer of F of the law firm that entered into a litigation delegation agreement with E.

B. On September 18, 2006, E transferred the claim KRW 2 billion to G, the representative of the claim group comprised of 7-8 creditors of E, to the National Health Insurance Corporation. 2) The National Health Insurance Corporation received notice of the above assignment of claim from E, and received notice from creditors of E to the effect that the above assignment of claim is null and void, after receiving notice of the above assignment of claim from E, the National Health Insurance Corporation received notice of the provisional seizure or seizure order from creditors of E, and received notice of the purport that the above assignment of claim is null and void, on the ground that “E cannot be known as a genuine creditor,” the deposited account amounting to KRW 1,236,980,50 over four occasions on the ground that the deposited person is “A and G

(3) As for the case of confirming the right to claim for payment of deposit money (the principal lawsuit) in Seoul Southern District Court 2008Kahap4200 (the principal lawsuit), E appointed H as a legal representative and filed a lawsuit against G to seek confirmation that the right to claim payment of deposit money in this case is against E. G appointed an attorney-at-law as a legal representative and filed a counterclaim against E to seek confirmation of the right to claim payment of deposit money in Seoul Southern District Court 2008Gahap8257 (Counterclaim) (the Seoul Southern Southern District Court 2008Gahap8257). As for the case of claiming for confirmation of the right to claim payment of deposit money in this case, G filed a counterclaim to seek confirmation that the right to claim payment of each of the deposit in this case is against G (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim”).

4) On June 25, 2008, E set the start-up amount as KRW 1 million and the contingent fee as KRW 9 million between the Defendant, who was an attorney-at-law affiliated with FF of a law firm on June 25, 2008, and the right of attorney of each of the instant cases to confirm the claim for payment of deposit money to F of a law firm.