logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.09 2013가단46521
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant against the plaintiff A,

(a) Attached drawings (3), (4), (5), (6), and (3) of the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list;

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table Nos. 3, (4), (5), (6), and (3), the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the deposit deposit of KRW 4,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 400,000 (payment on the first day of the previous month) and the lease agreement between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2012 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant on the deposit of KRW 16,00,00, KRW 60,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,60,000, and KRW 1,110,000 from January 1, 2012 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”); and the Plaintiff B entered into the lease agreement with the Defendant on the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. According to the instant lease agreement, in a case where a lessee fails to pay rent more than twice, the Plaintiffs can immediately terminate the lease agreement.

C. As to the instant lease agreement No. 1, the Defendant paid Plaintiff A the monthly rent from July 2010 to July 2010, respectively, to Plaintiff B as to the instant lease agreement No. 2 until July 2010, and did not pay it as the monthly rent thereafter.

On June 1, 2011, the Plaintiffs notified the termination of the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent more than twice.

E. The defendant occupies the real estate of this case until now.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 9 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, since the lease agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant of this case was lawfully terminated in accordance with the plaintiffs' termination notice due to the delay in rent by the defendant, the defendant delivered the real estate of this case to the plaintiff, and the first day of this case.

arrow