1. The supplementary participation of the Intervenor joining the Defendant is permitted.

2. The Defendant’s KRW 130,263,840 on the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s thereon.

1. In full view of facts without any dispute over the cause of the claim and the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the defendant issued an electronic bill with a face value of 130,263,830 won on May 27, 2016, and due date of payment on December 5, 2016, and delivered it to construction companies on board the company with an electronic bill number B (hereinafter "the bill of this case"), and construction on board the company as one of the first endorsements of the bill of this case, and the defendant's intervenor (the representative D) endorsements the bill of this case with a third party representative D, and the plaintiff who received the bill of this case from Eul's representative D is the last holder of the bill of this case with a face value of 130,263,830 won on the date of payment on the electronic bill of this case, but on the ground of non-payment, the defendant is obligated to pay 20% of the bill of this case's bill of this case's maturity and 2816% on the bill of this case's bill of this case.

2. In order to intervene in an assistance to assist one of the parties in a specific litigation case for the determination of legality of a participation in the assistance, an interest in the outcome of the relevant lawsuit must be interested. The term "interest" refers to a legal interest, not a de facto economic or emotional interest, and it refers to a case where the judgment in question is subject to res judicata or executory power of the judgment in question, or where the judgment in question does not directly affect the effect of the judgment in question.