1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff (appointed party) as to the above revoked part.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. On December 17, 2014, the gist of the plaintiffs' assertion: (a) around December 17, 2014, the defendant, at the D Apartment Management Office where the plaintiffs and the defendant reside, reported noise from the defendant's house to the effect that the plaintiffs generated noise at the defendant's house; (b) at the place where several apartment management offices are located, the plaintiffs have a large interest that "the plaintiffs report that noise from the house with no mental disorder is likely to occur; and (c) upon receipt of a confirmation letter stating false facts from the employees E of the above apartment management office, the plaintiffs' honor has undermined the plaintiffs' honor, and submitted it to the civil procedure by manipulating evidence; and (c) around April 19:22, 2015, the plaintiff's wife's wife's wife's husband's husband's wife's "Is no less than wirth," and (d) the plaintiffs' recent desire to make up for damages to the plaintiff's daily noise around 14:00, 2016.

B. 1) Determination of the above part of the tort claim: (a) Even if a civil trial is not bound by the finding of facts in a criminal trial, the fact that a criminal judgment already became final and conclusive on the same factual basis is material evidence; and (b) barring any special circumstance where it is difficult to adopt a factual judgment in a criminal trial in light of other evidence submitted in the civil trial, it cannot be acknowledged that the facts against this judgment are contrary, unless

(See Supreme Court Decision 91Da37690 Decided May 22, 1992, Supreme Court Decision 97Da24276 Decided September 30, 1997, Supreme Court Decision 2009Da19086 Decided July 9, 2009, etc.)