logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.06.18 2020고단353
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on October 19, 2016

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a B rocketing car.

On December 28, 2019, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.056% on blood alcohol level 0.05% on December 23:25, 2019, and led the Defendant to the right bypassing the road ahead of the rewing distance, which is located in 93, a monthly name of the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheong.

At the time of night, there was a vehicle waiting to turn to the left in the direction of the dry field park distance from the direction of the dry field park shooting distance, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as securing the revolving and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the operation of the motor vehicle is well examined, and to make a right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left in the direction of a non-original distance from the direction of the Sod field Park Park as seen above by the negligence that the bypass of the central line was invaded by the Defendant’s negligence while neglecting to do so, and received the even part behind the left-hand part of the DNA taxi, which was in the traffic signal, in order to turn to the left in the direction of a non-original distance from the direction of the Sod field park.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the 1,367,056 won of the repair cost by occupational negligence as above and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement 1 and a written estimate;

1. A survey report on actual condition, a field photograph of accident, and a report on the inspection of occurrence of case;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver and report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry reports such as criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (report attached to the same kind of power);

arrow