logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.09.15 2012고단914
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C EcooS car.

1. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.125% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.125%, and made the Defendant turn to the left at the right angle from the right edge of the backside of the backside of the backside hotel in front of the backside hotel in the breath of the breath city at the breath city at the breath.

At the time, there are nights and places where the median line is installed, so that the person engaged in the business of driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to keep the front line and the left and left, and to proceed without leaving the lane.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, following the victim's Estyna taxi driver's seat in the Eststuna taxi, and received the part of the Defendant's vehicle driver's seat in front of the car driver's seat.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt and tension, which requires treatment for about two weeks due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the damaged taxi so that 1,250,161 won, such as the exchange of pans, can move away from the scene without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. On March 8, 2012, at around 21:35, the Defendant: (a) caused a traffic accident; (b) went away; and (c) had the front road of the interlocked intersection, which is located in the Sinpo-si-si (i.e., Sinpo-si); and (d) had the victim’s G observer’s G observer’s car driving seat, which was parked in the same three-lane in the same direction due to the negligence that the Defendant failed to keep the bus properly in the course of driving along the two-lanes from the area of the square of No. 9 to the two-lanes; and (d) had the victim’s G observer’s car driving seat, which was parked in the same direction, carried out the front part of the Defendant’s car operation, and caused the damage to the vehicle due to the shock,

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above business is weak to the victim.

arrow