logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.29 2014고합735
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(직무유기)등
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each acquittal judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Defendant A

A. After the Defendant was appointed as a judicial police officer on June 10, 1992, the summary of the facts charged is a police officer who served as the Busan Regional Police Agency criminal and violent G from January 30, 2012 to February 11, 2014. B was engaged in activities by joining the “H organization” as the maximum violent organization in Busan around 1989. From around 2008 to around January 201, the Defendant was an actual one of H organization, and was succeeded to the status of H organization leader.

(1) On June 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) went to and maintained a business trip to Seoul with his team members in relation to the marriage awareness of the H organization’s assistant members I’s marriage; (b) around June 1, 2012; and (c) maintained their friendship and friendship.

After contact with B, at the same day of the same day, he met at K coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J around the same day.

The defendant will begin to B on his job “B, at the present prosecutor’s office, with the knowledge of the fact that he had been within the H organization.

The wind is very wind.

At present, four externally are two items, and the width is able to do so, the advice was given to "Mara who attends the same event site in the past," and then one million won was given by B in the envelope.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.

(2) On December 2012, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of duties) with respect to L, who was an offender, called the phone phone of the above B with the cell phone of the above B, thereby falling down on the day.

In the words “B”, the H’s behavior ledger L was issued for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (organization and activity of organizations, etc.) and was informed of the fact that arrest warrant was issued.

As a result, the defendant, as a judicial police officer, did not investigate and arrest Ls who committed a crime under the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, but divulged information about the investigation, thereby facilitating his/her escape, and allowing Ls to escape.

(3) An offender against B also violates the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (abandoning duties) (a).

arrow