The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (50 million won) pronounced by the lower court on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and is in depth against it, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, the act of exchanging premiums obtained through the use of the game product, such as the crime of this case, is likely to cause serious social harm, such as promoting a speculative spirit among the general public and hindering sound labor practice, so it is necessary to make a strict punishment.

In addition, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original court because new sentencing data has not been submitted in the first instance court.

In full view of other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.