(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.12 2019누33769

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.12 2019누33769

리콜계획 승인처분 취소

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part resulting in a dismissal or addition as follows, and thus, it shall be quoted pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

(Other matters alleged by the plaintiffs in the trial are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiffs in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court were examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the plaintiffs' assertion is justifiable). [The part to be dismissed or added] 7 pages 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "Euro 5 AG vehicle" of the 7th instance court is regarded as "Euro 5 AG vehicle."

On January 12, 2017, the Intervenor submitted a correction plan to the Defendant on January 12, 2017. The Intervenor submitted the correction plan to the Defendant on October 5, 2016. The Intervenor submitted the correction plan to the Defendant on December 27, 2016.”

The 7th judgment of the first instance court is the 15th model. The 18th model is the 15th model.

In the judgment of the first instance court, the “this court” of the first instance court 3) 2 is deemed to be “the first instance court.” The 8th 3rd 8th 3rd 8th 3rd 8th 4th 5th 5th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1

The legal interest here refers to a case where there are individual, direct and specific interests protected by the relevant laws and regulations and relevant laws and regulations, and it does not include the case where there is only a factual and economic interest, such as general and indirect interests of the general public as a result of the protection of public interest.

In addition, the relevant disposition is based on laws and regulations.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2019.7.12.선고 2019누33769 판결

-서울고등법원 2019.09.06 2019누35819

-대법원 2014.02.21 2011두29052

-의정부지방법원 2020.04.28 2019구합11960

-서울고등법원 2019.12.13 2019나2012020