1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 70,000,000 as well as 20% per annum from March 18, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

1. The Plaintiff loaned KRW 30,00,000 to the Defendant from April 2007 to March 15, 2009, in full view of the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment on the cause of the claim; or (b) Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 (a certificate of money car car, and it is recognized that the Defendant’s name is the Defendant after his fingerprint appraisal; (c) the authenticity of the entire document is presumed to have been established; (d) Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4; and (e) the whole purport of the arguments and arguments; and (e) the Plaintiff loaned KRW 40,00,000 to the Defendant on or around May 11, 201; and (e) the Plaintiff may be recognized as having lent KRW 70,000,000 to the Defendant on June 30, 201; and (e) according to the above acknowledged facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 300,00,000,00,00.

2. The defendant's defense that the plaintiff borrowed money from his father to raise living expenses with the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's act of drawing up the loan certificate of this case is a defense that the plaintiff's act of drawing up the loan certificate of this case is null and void by a bad will or a false agreement.

On the other hand, the evidence presented by the defendant alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant's intention to pay KRW 40,000,000, which was shown in the loan certificate of this case, was not a true intention or as a false declaration by a conspiracy, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently, the defendant's defense is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.