1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 150,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from May 25, 2018 to the date of full payment.

In full view of the purport of the argument as to the cause of the claim No. 1, the Defendant issued, on March 20, 2014, a promissory note with a face value of KRW 150 million at the time of payment, payment at the time of payment, place of payment, place of payment, and place of payment, and a promissory note with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) to the Plaintiff. On the same day, when a notary public delays the payment of the said note under Article 219 of the certificate of 2014 as a law firm C20, he/she can be found to have prepared and executed a notarized deed with no objection even if he/she is subject to compulsory

According to the above facts, the Defendant, as the issuer of the Promissory Notes, is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 150 million per annum from May 25, 2018 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of the original copy of the instant payment order claimed by the Plaintiff, to the day of complete payment, barring special circumstances.

The defendant's assertion is alleged to the purport that the plaintiff conspired with D to issue the Promissory Notes in this case by deceiving the defendant as if he would cause D to do construction work, but it did not actually perform construction work, so it is not sufficient to recognize the payment of the Promissory Notes. However, the defendant's assertion is not accepted because the statement of No. 1 is insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The claim of this case is accepted.