Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On June 29, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution for embezzlement in the Chungcheong District Court’s Chungcheong Branch Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2018.
The defendant is the representative director of the KAB, the KAB is the director of the KAB, and the KAB is the supervisory planning company of the "D", and the victims are people who participate in the same performance, such as lighting supervision, sound supervision, and medical supervision.
On October 30, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victims that “The Defendant will immediately pay the price upon the completion of the performance, because the performance is supported by the C organization,” while performing the musical work in H located in the Ha of the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do on November 4, 2017, and that “The Defendant will pay the price immediately after the performance is completed.”
However, in March 2017, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the victims' price due to the occurrence of a loss of KRW 400 million due to a musical performance that occurred while performing a musical performance in I "D" in the middle of March, 2017, even if the C organization received a subsidy of KRW 92 million, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the victims' price by repaying existing obligations
The Defendant, by deceiving the victims as such, had them participate in the above two-time performances, and caused the victims to take part in the public performances, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits from the victimJ, as it did not pay wages of KRW 2,00,000,000 for wages of KRW 3,000,000 for wages of KRW 2,750,000 for the said two-time public performances, and the sound supervision over the victim L for the said one-time public performances, with the amount of KRW 1,282,00 for wages of KRW 4,720,00 for the sound equipment siren, and KRW 5,000 for wages and rental expenses of KRW 1,875,00 for the victims, as well as KRW 1875,00 for the total victims.
2. It is recognized that the Defendant did not pay sirens, etc. as stated in the facts charged.
However, considering the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is either wages or sirens to the victims.