A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the victim Myang Tourism Co., Ltd. is involved.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 29, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site on June 17, 201, a fine of 1.5 million won for the same crime in the same court on June 17, 2011, and a fine of 1.5 million won for the same crime on October 31, 2013, and two or more years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same court on October 31, 2013, and the above judgment becomes final and conclusive on October 31, 2013, and has the same kind of power twice or more.

1. On September 22, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 00:35, the Defendant driven a 100cc motor bicycle without registration at the section of about 500 meters from the distance of the inside, middle and front of the inside, middle, and front of the road in the same Ri, under the influence of alcohol content 0.158% of the blood alcohol content.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a non-registered motor bicycle 100cc. without mandatory insurance at the date, time, place, etc. of the above paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in the driving of a non-registered motor bicycle 100cc.

On September 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 00:35 on September 22, 2013, and made the two-lanes of the distance of the sub-office in front of the distance of the inside of the sub-office in the front of the Eup in the Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant left the right-hand turn at the right-hand side from the front line.

Since there is a signal, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle in such a case.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the negligence in violation of the signal to the right side from the left side of the defendant's proceeding direction to shock the front line of the Dabsp car owned by the Hyundai Capital Capital Capital Co., Ltd.