The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspension of execution, observation of protection, community service work, 160 hours) of the court below is too unlimited and unfair, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unfasible and unfair.

2. 판단 피해자들이 노래방 요금을 모두 지급했음에도 피고인 A가 피고인 B을 불러 피해자들을 폭행하고 이미 바닥에 쓰러져 아무 저항을 하지 못하는 피해자들을 2~3 분간 무차별적으로 폭행한 후 한겨울에 노상에 방치하고 도주하였고, 그로 인하여 피해자들이 안와 골절로 인공뼈 삽입 수술을 하고 갈비뼈 5개와 코뼈가 부러지고 눈 밑 피부를 23 바늘 꿰매고 간과 머리가 손상되는 중한 상해를 입었고 현재도 피해자 한 명은 안구가 함몰되고 얼굴 신경이 마비되는 등으로 후 유장애, 추상장애가 남았으며 피해자들이 입은 정신적인 피해 역시 상당할 것이다.

Defendants have many records of punishment for violent crimes.

As the Defendants were identified as the perpetrator due to the police investigation, they paid 20 million won and 3 million won to the victims and received a written agreement and a written withdrawal of complaint. However, the victims were forced to reach an agreement.

Appellanting, the defendants' punishment is sought.

In addition to the above agreement, the Defendants made a deposit of KRW 5 million in the first instance court and KRW 3 million in the first instance court, and deposited KRW 8 million in the first instance court and KRW 2 million in the first instance court.

As above, considering the unfavorable or favorable circumstances to the Defendants, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

The prosecutor's assertion is with merit and the defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is reasonable and in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.