The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence of 10 months sentenced by the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime of this case, the defendant is willing not to drive alcohol again after the crime of this case, and there is a family member to support.

However, the crime of this case was committed while the defendant driven a cargo under the influence of 0.181% alcohol level, and even after being examined by the police station due to the above drunk driving, in light of the degree of the driving of the cargo under the influence of alcohol level of 0.142%, and the degree of the driving and the driving distance, etc. of the vehicle, and it does not seem that there is an urgent or inevitable circumstance that the defendant should drive the vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.142%. (In the case of a drunk driving as stated in paragraph (2) of the crime, the defendant refused a police officer to request a proxy driver to stop for returning home after being examined by the police station, but it is doubtful that the defendant's assertion of the cause of the drunk driving itself has a history of being subject to multiple criminal punishment prior to the crime of this case, and that the defendant has been sentenced twice or more, and the judgment of the court below was also sentenced again, and the defendant's age, circumstances leading to the defendant's occupation, and circumstances leading to the sentencing of this case, etc.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.