A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 10, 2014, at around 20:45, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 on October 10, 2014 that he was fighting in front of the House B in Yongcheon-si, the Defendant, at the 112 report, solicited the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, and was assaulted by the Defendant, i.e., a slope D affiliated with the police box of Yongcheon-si Police Station, and the Defendant, in time, “this spule gue”, etc., who was flue by using the left blue blue, and sphere D’

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing as follows) of the suspended sentence are as follows: (a) the defendant commits a crime by contingency and commits a crime by fault; (b) the degree of obstruction of execution of his/her duties is relatively minor; and (c) the extent of obstruction of execution of his/her duties or duties is relatively minor; and (d) the reasons for various kinds of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; (b) obstruction of performance of duties; (c) obstruction of performance of official duties; (d) obstruction of performance of duties; (d) type 1; (e) mitigation area (a) mitigation area (a minor