1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Bills falling under subparagraph 1 of basic facts: An agenda item No. 2 of change of the name of the defendant: An agenda item No. 3 of approval for resignation of the person to the head of F: An agenda item No. 4 of approval for resignation of the person to the head of F: An agenda item No. 5 of the Articles of Incorporation and the Enforcement Rule: Suspension of qualification for the members (4 persons whose membership rights are suspended, and

A. The defendant is a church belonging to the general assembly of Korea's Twitter and its affiliated Diplomatic Association.

B. On June 19, 2016, the Defendant church held a joint meeting by convening a temporary meeting E with the direction of the Korea Labor Union Council, and passed a resolution on the following agenda items:

(hereinafter “the first resolution of this case”). The above joint council is referred to as “the first joint council of this case” (hereinafter “the first joint council of this case”).

On November 13, 2016, the Defendant church held a joint meeting with the convening of the above E, and passed a resolution of election in office with the head of G, H, and I as the agenda item 1, and passed a resolution of election in office with G, H, and I as the head of G, H, and I as the agenda item 2, and passed a resolution on the estimated budget with the agenda item 2.

(hereinafter “instant Resolution 2”, and the above Joint Council is referred to as “Joint Council 2”). D.

On March 12, 2017, the defendant church held a joint meeting with the convening of the above E, and passed a resolution on the following agenda:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant resolution 3”, and the above joint council’s agenda items No. 1: The agenda items No. 2 of the Settlement of Accounts Bill No. 2016: The case at issue No. 3 of the Settlement of Accounts Bill No. 2017: J: the case at issue: J in the presence of a wood officer, and the case at issue No. 1, 2, and 3 collectively referred to as “each of the instant resolutions” / [based on recognition] without any dispute, Eul’s entries in subparagraphs 1, 2, and 14, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. With respect to the plaintiff's request for confirmation of invalidity of each of the instant resolutions, the defendant is no longer a member of the defendant church and there is no benefit to seek confirmation of invalidity of each of the instant resolutions, as the plaintiff is not a member of the defendant church.

In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings, the Korean War Veterans Association, which belongs to the defendant church, shall be held by taking into account the statements of the evidence Nos. 11 and 28.