logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.11.29 2018고단1829
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Presumption of Facts] The Defendant is a person who engages in a ship trading brokerage business under the trade name of “D” in the case of remaining women.

E Around August 18, 2016, the shipbuilding contract was concluded to build a shipbuilding ship of 9.77 tons in the name of K and K, which is a shipbuilding company in the Namamamamama-gun G, which is a shipbuilding company in the Namama-gun G, but the remainder excluding the down payment of 20,000,000 won, shall be paid by borrowing from the Suhyup, and a fishery permit necessary for the design approval, etc. of the above vessel shall be purchased from the Defendant, and the remainder excluding the down payment of 10,000,000 won shall be paid by the Defendant, and the remainder excluding the down payment of the down payment of 10,000,000 won is different from the actual agreement, and there is no dispute, and there is no agreement in the case of the purchase-price for fishery permission, and there is no statement about the amount between the Defendant and E, which is different from the statement about the amount between the Defendant and the purchase-price.

On July 1, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 10,000,000,000 from E, out of the sales price of the vessel permit, and registered the owner on the vessel register of J (4.97 tons) and K (4.87 tons) with the name of E as a result of sale on the same day.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant was in possession of a private document at around October 2016, when it is anticipated that the agreement would not be paid for the remainder of the fishery permit agreed upon by E because the agreement was not approved under the said I’s name, and the Defendant was demanded by I to return the seal imprint.

On October 18, 2016, the owner of the I’s seal imprint was affixed to the seller column of the certificate of sale of a fishing vessel in the second place in the Defendant’s office and returned the above certificate to I.

The defendant.

arrow