logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.15 2013나75085
건물명도 등
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendants, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The construction contract and subcontract contract 1) JJJ D Diplomatic Association of Korea (hereinafter “JJJ”)

Around July 2007, the Corporation for the Integrated Construction of Oils (hereinafter referred to as the “Comprehensive Construction of Oils”)

The construction contract was concluded to construct the instant building on the land of 791.7 square meters in Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, by setting the construction cost as KRW 1.65 million. However, the construction contract was concluded to build the instant building on the land of 791.7 square meters, and the construction work was suspended when the third floor of the instant building was completed. 2) The Jridge changed the name of M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "M") and the construction work cost to be KRW 1.32 billion on July 2008.

3) Meanwhile, Franchi Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Fla Savings Bank”)

(1) The court below held that Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 (hereinafter “Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 were 1 and 300 million won of maximum debt amount on the building of this case. Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 were 1 and 300 million won of maximum debt amount on the building of this case. Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 were 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 were 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 were 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 were 1 and 3.

arrow