The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below seems to recognize and reflect the crime of this case, the damage suffered by the damaged police officer is minor, and the surrounding persons want not to be punished by the defendant, and the crime of this case is legitimately used for violence against the police officer who is performing official duties in order to restrain the defendant from drinking and scambling. It is necessary to strictly punish the defendant since such crime harms the authority of public authority and impedes the establishment of legal order. Three times of criminal records by violence include nine times of criminal records by the defendant, and three times of criminal records by the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties like the crime of this case. In particular, the court below committed the crime of this case after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year due to obstruction of performance of official duties on October 11, 2012, and even after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year, the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the defendant committed the crime of this case for the same reason as the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor before and after the suspended sentence of execution, and the defendant did not have any motive and reason for the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.