The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) the degree of injury of the instant case was relatively minor; (b) the Defendant was led to the confession of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime even though he was committed a number of violent crimes; and (d) there was no agreement with the victims; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; (d) the motive, means and methods of the instant crime; and (e) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, are excessively unreasonable.

On the other hand, even though the defendant did not spread to the victim I with regard to the crime of injury of this case, the defendant first assessed the defendant with the beer cruel, and the defendant also collected the beer cruel to the above victim. Thus, the defendant asserts that such circumstance should be considered in sentencing.

According to the statements, etc. of each police's protocol of interrogation of the suspect for the suspect, H and I by the defendant, as stated in the facts charged in this case, the defendant first spreads the beer to the victim I as stated in the facts charged, and then the above victim prices the beer, and the defendant again was found to have collected beer residues to the above victim. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.