A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “D” company whose main business is printing, reproduction, etc. in the wife population C.

In the G Office of Victim F’s Management in Ma from April to May, 2012, the Defendant held that “The Defendant would give the victim the right to collect the land discharged from D from D for two years, including the amount of KRW 110 million to KRW 30 million to refund the deposit to the existing collection company.”

However, the amount of the strike discharged from D is merely about 8 to 9 tons, so even if the victim received the deposit from the victim, there was no intention or ability to supply the victim with the 50 tons of the strike every month.

Nevertheless, as above, the defendant deceivings the victim, and is also against the victim.

5.23.23.20 million won, around the same year.

6.1.Around January 1, 2000, a total of KRW 110 million was remitted to the Defendant’s deposit passbook.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. The statement of the victim in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F, I, J, and H;

1. Content certification, recording records, four copies, 2014Kadan50247 written judgments of the Suwon District Court Act;

1. An investigation report (a copy of tax invoice for the sale of paper stuffs) [First, the Defendant is merely a return of KRW 35 million out of the above KRW 110 million to the effect that the Defendant received the payment from the victim in form in order to pretend a sales contract for paper stuffs manufacturing machines, and the deposit received in relation to the actual marbing collection contract is the remainder of KRW 75 million. However, in full view of the witness F and H’s respective statutory statements, the number of court rulings, the number of court rulings, the number of court rulings, the number of court rulings, and the investigation reports (a copy of tax invoice for the sale of paper stuffs).