The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person engaged in driving BE vehicles.

On October 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 14:30, and passed through the Cheongdo-dong Office at a point of 121.7km in the Seoul Cheongdo-dong, and driven at a speed of about 30km/h from the 6-lane in the direction of the Pando-JC.

Since D Freight driving at the five-lane later of the vehicle at the time, C is running along the vehicle, in such a case, the driver who wishes to change the course of the vehicle has the duty of care to not change the course when it is likely to verify the safety of the course and impede normal traffic.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the course, and caused the shock of the front part of the cargo vehicle driven by C, which was driven by the Defendant, in five-lanes of the front part of the vehicle driven by C.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered a serious injury, such as the permanent real name, etc. in a unit, from the victim E, who was accompanied by the head of the above cargo vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 3 (1) and the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement

(b) To submit a written agreement that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant after prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;