The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. From May 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) around 22:00 on March 22, 2013, the Defendant had been aware of the victim C (V, 23 years of age) who was working in the same workplace; (b) used the Defendant’s vehicle parked near the “Ecafeteria” located in Heung-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si (hereinafter “Ecafeteria”); and (c) used the Defendant’s act of drinking alcohol as a drinking time with the victim, thereby causing other victims to have sexual intercourse by drinking alcohol so as to have other victims lose the spirit; and (d) made a plastic container using ethyl ethyl 3 years of age, which was in possession of a certificate of non-faceted in the Gero-gu, Cheongju-si; and (e) made it in a lue container by using the ethyl ethyl 5 process, which was in possession of it as a result of a lux.

The Defendant, at around 04:00 on March 23, 2013, put the ethyl melting powder prepared by the victim in the beer cans where the victim was fested by creshing the rest between toilets at the time of Cheongju, and tried to put the beer in the beer m, which contains the beer ingredients at the beer mm, and to have the bed down in a deep sleep by the effect of the beer mm, without knowing the fact. However, the Defendant attempted to put the bed of the victim who was in a state of avoiding the failure to resist, and to have sexual intercourse with the bed and panty of the victim who was in a state of avoiding the failure, but did not come into the wind of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to rape the victim, but attempted to commit it.

2. The crime stated in the facts charged of judgment is a crime falling under Article 297 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 306 of the Criminal Act. According to the statement of "agreement and a written application for non-prosecution of punishment" in the preparation of the victim submitted to this court, the victim can be acknowledged the fact that the victim revoked the complaint against the defendant on June 17, 2013, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327