beta
Text
1. The Defendants are with respect to one half of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts under the basis of facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) by taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings. A.
Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s second son, and Defendant C was the spouse of Defendant B, but was divorced from Defendant B on January 12, 2015.
B. The ownership transfer of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) on August 20, 1990, while the Plaintiff acquired ownership of each real estate of this case on August 20, 199, and on November 27, 2009, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of each of the Defendants on the ground that the donation was made under Article 43318 of the Seodaemun District Court’s receipt of the Seodaemun Branch of Seoul Western District Court’s receipt of the said real estate.
2. Claim against Defendant C
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion is limited to Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “D”).
(1) The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) was only applicable to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents.
According to the above, the Plaintiff’s children, including the Defendants, and their spouses title trust some of the instant real estate in order to be supplied with housing by way of having only a number of real estate owned within the rearrangement project zone. However, the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name (hereinafter “Real Estate Real Name Act”) on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name (hereinafter “Real Estate Real Name Act”).
(2) The Defendants have the duty to cancel the registration of transfer of ownership under the names of the Defendants, which completed each of the above real estate to the Plaintiff. (2) The Plaintiff asserted by Defendant C is prior to the failure of the Defendants’ marital life.